Asian Urban Information Center of Kobe
| HOME | ABOUT US | PROGRAMS | PUBLICATIONS | DATABASE | WHAT'S NEW | ACCESS | LINKS |

City Report and Action Plan

Olongapo

Mr. Randino Albina Ledesma

Mr. Randino Albina Ledesma
Community Development Assistant 1, Urban Basic Services Program (UBSP-Reach-UP-SUGPO)
Office of City Mayor
Olongapo City Government
Philippines



CITY REPORT

Education System

Public school system is administered by the Department of Education (DepED) of the Philippine Government.

Education is offered through formal and non-formal systems. Formal Education includes achieving different levels and milestones. From 3 - 5 years old, children are in preschool. Elementary grade consists of students 6 - 11 years old and high school is from 12 - 15 years old. College Level is a Bachelor's Degree of 4 years or more (depending upon the chosen course).

The 2002 basic education curriculum aims at raising the quality of the Filipino learners and graduates and empowering them for lifelong learning which requires the attainment of functional literacy. It provides more focus on the tool learning areas for an adequate development of the competencies for learning how to learn. It likewise provides an experiential learning area where the learner can apply practical knowledge and life skills and demonstrate deeper appreciation of Filipino culture and heritage and making values development integral to all learning areas.

A non-formal education (NFE) alternative learning system was developed. This is to be a road map for "Education For All" and a vision for 2015. The system derives from the collaborative thinking of all stakeholders offering programs and projects intended for the upliftment of social and educational status of the community.

Thus, the Alternative Learning System as renamed in Executive Order 366 dated September 16, 2004 is an implementing arm of DepED and a vehicle in providing functional learning capability to the Out of School Youth (OSY) and Adults aging from six (6) years old and above.

The massive advocacy and social mobilization strengthened the ties and collaboration between DepED - ALS (NFE) and other institutions or stakeholders who have strong concern in the development and uplifting of the economic status and welfare of individuals from the quagmire of poverty.

The programs offered by the DepED - ALS (NFE) as lead agency in coordination and collaboration with other agencies, government and non-government agencies to the Out of School Youth and Adults of whatever ethnic or religious group were very beneficial and are doing good to meet the vision and mission of non-formal education, now known by its new name, the Alternative Learning System.

To carry out the mandate of the Alternative Learning System, the DepED Division Office designed a Division ALS Organizational Structure. This may help the program to be effective and efficient in order to reach the target learners. Through the initiative of the City Schools Superintendent and in coordination with the local government unit, the program is well-served to the target learners.

Education as a fundamental right is enshrined in the Constitution and should be accessible to all types of learners through the formal, non-formal and informal channels. As a corollary, the state must provide adequate places of learning with the appropriate social as well as physical infrastructure.

Olongapo School

Current States and Challenges

There are some problems with completion, survival, promotion and participation rates.

  1. The low completion rate that is, pupils/students finishing Grade VI or Fourth Year means that there are socio-economic factors that may have caused it like the disintegration of the family and the poor economic conditions prevailing in the community.
  2. The low survival rate that is, the cohort of pupils/students reaching Grade VI or Fourth Year tells that the school has not provided them the needed teaching-learning atmosphere that maintained the schools' holding power.
  3. The high retention rate augurs well for the set of pupils/students that came back to school the following year. It means that few of them left school which indicating better programs and feasible incentives for students to remain in school.
  4. The drop-out rate in the elementary school could mean that a great number of pupils left school during the year which spells maybe that no interventions were provided as a contrast to the high school.
  5. The high gross enrollment ratio speaks of high access to the schools although there are still more left unschooled.
  6. The low net enrollment ratio or participation rate shows that a great number of school-age children are not in school and they should be enticed and encouraged to go to school either in the formal or alternative learning system.
  7. The disparity in the promotion rate in the elementary and secondary might be due to parents' concept of just letting children finish at least Grade VI with a diploma and the high cost of high school schooling and the early joining of the youth in the labor force.
  8. The high graduation rate indicates that having reached the last year of school, the pupil/student has a drive to finish the year and the school has met their needs.
  9. The very high transition rate shows that there is strong force that led graduates in the elementary grades to move to high school which speaks well of sound teaching-learning situations in the schools.
  10. The performance indicators in the elementary fared better than the secondary which means that the poorest link is in the secondary. Much remains to be done in the schools to attain the goals of efficiency, effectiveness, equity and excellence. Therefore, more revisiting of school programs, projects and activities, re-tooling of the staff and re-engineering of the system are imperative.
Olongapo Schoolchildren

ACTION PLAN

Primary Goals:

  1. Universalization of Primary Education for Urban Poor (6 years old to 12 years old)
  2. Improve Quality of Education
  3. Create new schools & infrastructures
Specific Goals Activities Responsible Person/Agency Supports/Resources Needed Time Frame Monitoring
1. Improve the education
Talk & make dialogue to Mayor & 18 Department Heads The participant from Olongapo City Data from AUICK - Hard copy, soft copy, videos, etc. Last week of Nov 2005 Plans of Activities
Make a documentations (IEC) or Summary of 11 days learning activities in Video Presentations Me & Public Affairs/ Information Office Data from AUICK - Hard copy, soft copy, videos, etc. First week of Dec 2005 to Jan 2006 Plans of Activities
Video Presentation of Universalization of Education for Urban Poor to Department of Education (City) Me & Public Affairs/ Information Office City Government Jan to Dec 2006 Plans of Activities
Advocacy Programs- (Media, Meetings, IEC) to increase enrollment rate by 80 percent Department of Education Community Organizations, PTA, Non-Government Organizations & City Government Apr to Jun 2006 Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Advocacy Programs- (Media, Meetings, IEC) to reduce drop-out rate by 80 percent Department of Education Community Organizations, PTA, Non-Government Organizations & City Government Jun to Mar 2006 Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Lobby for passage of City Resolutions for Increasing & Prioritizing Education for Budget Allocation Department of Education Community Organizations, PTA, Non-Government Organizations & City Government Jan to Mar 2006 Community Organizations/ Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Increase scholarship program especially the girls and urban poor children by 100 percent Urban Basic Services Program, Department of Social Welfare & Development, NGOs & Department of Education City Government & Community Organizations Jun 2006 UBSP & Department of Education, City Government
Political Support not institutionalized Strengthen political support by institutionalizing the annual increase of budgetary request in the master plan Department of Education Community Organizations, PTA, Non-Government Organizations & City Government Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 Community Organizations/ Schools Division & City Planning Dev't Office
2. Quality of education
Increase Budgetary Allocation for Education Conduct a dialogue between all school principals for evaluation of their needs Department of Education Stakes holders, Non- Government Organizations & City Government Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Lobby for passage of City resolution for the increase of financial allocation for education Department of Education Stakes holders, Non- Government Organizations & City Government Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Teaching & Non-Teaching Personnel of Department of Education are not enough for a relatively comparable Teacher-Student Ratio To increase the number of Personnel of DepED especially the Teaching Personnel or Classroom Teacher Department of Education Parents Teacher- Associations & City Government Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Strengthen the capabilities of the teaching & non-teaching personnel of the Department of Education Allowing the personnel to attend training in official time Department of Education Parents Teacher- Associations & City Government Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Involve more Non-Government Organizations to participate in the Education activities Department of Education Parents Teacher- Associations & City Government Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
3. School buildings and other facilities
Adopt-A- School Programs Involve more Non-Government & Private Organizations to participate in the Education activities Department of Education Community Organizations, PTA, Non-Government Organizations, City Government & International Agency Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 City Engineering Department/Schools Division & City Planning Dept Office
Two- shifts classes to accommodates enrollment
Make a Master Plan for Universalization of Education for Urban Poor Talk & make dialogue to Mayor & 18 Department Heads Department of Education Parents Teacher- Associations, City Government, Technical & Financial Support from AUICK Jan to Dec 2006 to 2010 City Government & Other Partner agencies

CONTENTS

Newsletter No.46

FEATURE:
Universalization of Primary Education for Urban Poor

1. AUICK Second 2005 Workshop

2. City Reports and Action Plans

 Chittagong
 Weihai
 Chennai
 Surabaya
 Kuantan
 Faisalabad
 Olongapo
 Khon Kaen
 Danang

ARCHIVE

3. Research Notes:
    ASIAN URBANIZATION IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM
    The 2004 Baseline Survey on MDGs in AACs

4. Visit to AUICK Associate Cities: Weihai and Surabaya

5. AUICK's Strategy Development in Surabaya

6. Committee Meetings
    Executive Committee
    International Advisory Committee
    Domestic Advisory Committee


Copyright © 2003 Asian Urban Information Center of Kobe. All rights reserved.