|
Reproductive Health and Primary Health Care in
Urban Areas in Khon Kaen Province, Thailand
I. Introduction
Our world has already entered the 21st century. But
it is also a world with many contradictions. We are living in a world
community which ahs wealth not known before. But it is also a world
with scarcity unknown in the past. Poverty is rising sharply in the
midst of wealthy societies. Though there is more wealth there are fewer
people who practices care, and societies critically need more labour,
but unemployment is rising! It is said that by 2025 A.D. majority of
the population in ESCAP region will live in urban areas and such urban
areas could become home to as many as two third of the region’s
population living in the poverty with lack of the water supply,
sanitation, child care, and human services, making their lives worse
than living in rural poverty.
While the level of Health care has increased in the world as a whole,
the level of disease is rising. As persons concerned with Primary
Health Care, we cannot help noting that poverty and malnutrition among
the peoples of developing nations underlie much sickness and death. But
these are seldom seen as part of the health problem.
Even before the experience of the economic downturn, and when Thailand
was being considered as a potential Newly Industrialized Country (NIC),
it was estimated in1989 that about a third of the then Thai population
was living in poverty.
It has been pointed out that the term Primary Health Care became part
of the general international vocabulary used for making reference to a
new type of health care system to provide “health for all” among the
peoples of the developing nations of the world.
But the initiatives or programs to provide primary health care faced
many basic problems. For example, there is the problem in delivery of
health care, as the nations in the region follow the western medical
model. Such a model id often referred to as the “mechanical or
engineering model”. It looks upon the human body as a machine in the
part, which can have break - downs. Another problems connected with
such a model is that it implies the need for specialization. Yet
another problem arising from this type of model is that the model is
associated with inequality in participation, or inequality in the
enjoyment of benefits it provides.
Further, the delivery of health care usually becomes a matter of one
way traffic in which the providers of health care either have the
initiative, or they themselves determine how and what kind of health
care shall be provided to those who needed it. Those needing it
actually do not have the opportunity to participate in determining what
kind of care is needed or how it may be provided. They become primarily
passive users or recipients of the care, which the providers
unilaterally decide to supply.
To
Top
Over against such a prevailing system, primary
health care is looked upon as closer to the users or those at the
receiving end. It deals with them as person or individual human beings
in the setting of the community. The Alma Ata Conference convened by
WHO and UNICEF in 1979 looked upon primary health care as linked most
closely to the economic and social development of a given community.
The conference in its declaration defined primary health care as based
on methods which are practical and socially acceptable, and also base
don technology which is universally accessible to both individuals as
well as families in the community through their full participation and
at a cost that the community and country can afford in a spirit of
self-reliance and determination.
And primary health care has to be understood as standing on three basic
pillars viz. consumer participation, equity, and collaboration between
medical and social science sectors.
Though there can be general acceptance about the definition and meaning
of primary health care, we still have to contend with problems about
its delivery system.
How can we uniformly assess the extent and manner of community
involvement and user participation? Further how are we to evaluate the
quality of care given? Accordingly we have the need to agree on a
limited view of definition of primary health care for our research
purpose. Further we had to limit ourselves in terms of its scope, and
the geographical area for its focus. “The quality of care as a
distinctive measurable concept has been developed more in the area of
family planning and reproductive health. And the plan concentrated
primarily on the medical delivery part of the over-all health system.
At the same time we believe it is necessary to raise questions about
primary health issues arising from environmental conditions. Organized
research in both subsystems of medical delivery and of reproductive
health and primary health care is what has been conducted. It is our
hope that the improvement in primary health care system would lead to
the growth of a healthy population. The assessment for such will be
based on various mortality and morbidity rates. The most basic are
Infant Mortality Rates (IMR) and Maternal Mortality Rates (MMR), which
are specially useful in examining the difference between rich and
examining poor nations.
We have used the research design as can be noticed from the sections
that follow. Geographically the research focused on the urban areas in
Khon Kaen Province in northeastern part of Thailand.
The general objective of the research was to study the situation of
reproductive health and the implementation of Primary Health Care
programs in the urban in the above-mentioned Khon Kaen Province.
Specifically the research in the urban areas of the province dealt with
characteristics of the population, family planning services as provided
situations of reproductive health, public health administrative
structures of health care and public health services.
To
Top
Further the concepts and policies of political as
well as technical leaders, system providers at various levels regarding
health care and public health services were studied. Additionally the
levels of perception and satisfaction on the part of those at the
receiving end of health services system were also examined.
Families are basic unit of society and we can say reproductive health
matters serve as the umbrella of health care. In a way they can be
looked upon as being the other side of the coin of primary health care,
“Reproductive health is a state of complete physical, mental and social
well being and not merely the absence of disease an infirmity, in all
matters related to the reproductive system and to its functions and
processes. Reproductive health therefore implies that people are able
to have satisfying and safe sex life and that they have the capability
to reproduce and freedom to decide if, when and how often to do so.
Implicit in this last condition are the rights of men and women to be
informed and to have access to safe, effective, affordable, and
acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, as well as other
methods of their choice for regulation of fertility which are not
against the law, and the right of access to appropriate health care
services that will enable women to go safely through pregnancy and
childbirth and provide couples with the best chance of having a health
infant” (ICDP 1994)
Over all health care depends on economic and social development of a
nation. It also depends on the accepted religious norms, and the
values, which undergo changes with passage of time and progress of
knowledge.
In the ninth National economic and Social Development Plan of Thailand
the quality of life targets focus on maintaining a balanced demographic
structure and appropriate family size, every citizen should have access
to resources to achieve good health. Education as well as health
services suitable especially to the way of life of the poor should be
widely available, as envisaged among the development priorities of the
Ninth Plan.
The report as given in the pages follows arose out of the completion of
the research process. The research was based on secondary data
collected from various organizations, interviews with care providers,
and leaders, and on the surveys of the service users. Structured
questionnaire were used for the surveys. The reports obviously contains
the description of Khin Kaen Province and the study areas, the finding
based on the interviews, and the results of the survey of respondents.
To
Top
II. Literature Review
Khon Kaen Province, Municipality and the city: Reproductive and Primary
Health Care
Population Characteristics
Located some 450 kilometers from Bangkok, the
capital of Thailand, The city of Khon Kaen is small but growing rapidly
in the central sector of northeastern region of the country. It is the
administrative seat of the Province and is fast becoming the major
center of education, finance, business and administrative activities
for the whole region.
Based on the extracts from “Khon Kaen Urban Population” by Chanawongse
et al. (2000), khon Kean Province, of which the city is the part,
extends for 10,866 sq. km. and has a population of 1.67 million (1996).
It is primarily agricultural, with cultivation accounting for 60% of
its land and 70% of its population. Rice growing makes up two third of
the province’s arable land. But the sandy soil is not well suitable for
rice growing. Over all, the province is poor, and somewhat isolated
from metropolitan Bangkok. A railroad built from Bangkok to Nong Khai
on the borders of Laos, passes a few meters from Khon Kaen, and it has
been primarily a means for poor rural people to migrate to Bangkok for
work. Growth of Khon Kaen has been a result of the central governments’
policies to promote economic development in other major regions outside
of central Thailand. The government has invested in administrative
buildings, a major university, an airport, land and irrigation schemes,
and the city’s infrastructure. Now a major motorway from Bangkok
through Khon Kaen to the border of laos, provides for easy
transportation to the capital within four hours. There is also a
railway line serving the same route. The bank of Thailand makes Khon
Kaen its center to serve whole of the country’s northeast region. On
the whole the towns, which had grown along the route, appear well
supplied with water, energy and waste disposal means, providing a
relatively healthy environment for them. There is little of heavy
vehicular congestion and air pollution that plague many areas of rapid
urbanization.
Khon Kaen City has a popultion of 129,581 (September 2001) representing
some 44,381 families (Sskondhavat 2001). In 1970-1971 there were about
600 births per years producing rates just below 20 per thousand in that
period (Chanawongse 2000)
On the whole the health service system of Thailand has grown steadily
over the past century providing quality primary health care throughout
urban and rural areas. The results has been a dramatic decline in
mortality and a general increase in the quality of life for virtually
the entire population. Khon kaen municipality and Province have both
participated fully in the progress. According to data available from
the Provincial Health Office, there were in 1997, 250 Health Clinics,
2994 staff and 28,217 health service users. Along with the public
facilities, those related to the private sector also are growing. In
1997 mortality rate for mothers was 80 per 100,000 and for infants 10.6
per 1000. Mortality for infants and birth giving mothers are strongly
affected by the quality of primary health care services which provide
vaccinations to protect against early childhood diseases, and the
pre-natal as well as ante-natal care that reduce the risk of death from
child-bearing. Other public health investment, such as that for water
and sewage also has a major impact on infant and maternal mortality.
The general progress of economic development and expanding physical
infrastructure that the city and province have experienced over the
past few decades as well as the increased provision of good primary
health care have certainly contributed to the reduction of mortality
rates for mothers and infants.
Khon Kaen’s economy like that of Thailand as a whole has grown steadily
over the past three decades and more. The city’s economy had registered
seven percent growth per year and it is more rapid growth than for the
whole of northeastern region. Anyone familiar with the region has seen
very rapid growth in less than a generation. The improvements in the
physical infrastructure are dramatic and visible: from roads government
offices to shops and private homes. Material goods, foods, and
personnel services have increased.
Per capita income, bank deposits and city tax revenues have grown. In
spite of the 1997 economic downturn, Khon Kaen Province can expect
steady progress in the general character of the economy. A great
increase in unemployment or in demands for the jobs is not expected.
To
Top
Situation of reproductive and public health
administration, health care services
Thailand has had one of the world’s most successful
national family planning programs, which has helped to produce one of
the world’s most rapid declines in fertility. The fertility decline was
accomplished without coercion and without high rates of abortion or
maternal mortality. This indicates that the family planning programs
has been an outstanding success, not only in lowering fertility and
population growth, but also in increasing the quality of life for poor
rural women and children who are usually left out of enjoying the
benefits of modern development programs.
Khon Kaen stands at an interesting juncture. It can be assumed that the
city will continue to g\row and the quality of the life of its citizens
will improve. Work still needs to be done on collection of more
specific data and to plan the future on the basis on more updated and
accurate information. Happily, research undertaken in November 2001 by
one Dr. Chuanchom provides helpful information.
In a comprehensive study there are components, which need to be taken
into account if plans for the improvement of reproductive health are to
be developed. Family planning; health of mother and child; control of
diseases such as AIDS, cancer in the reproductive system and sexually
transmitted diseases; effects of abortion and miscarriages on mothers;
form such components. Then there are those who cannot conceive. There
is also the need for sex education. Study of the health of youth as
well as the aged persons is also necessary. But all these can
constitute a tall order in terms of limited time and resources (both
human and material). We have to proceed with that data we have and the
personnel available.
To cope with the health needs in the province there are different
levels of administration and delivery of public health. Structurally
there are twenty general and five specific districts in the province.
There are 419,237 registered households in 2201 villages within 198 sub
districts. There are two municipalities viz. Khon Kean and Muang phon.
These have sub district municipalities, Tambon Administrative
Organization and Tambon Councils.
To
Top
In terms of public health services facilities under
the Ministry of Public Health, there are two general hospitals viz Khon
Kaen Hospital and City Hospital beside the Maternity and Child Care
Hospital, the contagious disease Hospital and Psychiatry Hospital.
There are public health offices in each of the 25 districts. The sixth
health center for public health promotion in the province. Three
centers for control and treatment of contagious diseases are
established, each concentrating on HIV/STD, Tuberculosis, and leprosy,
respectively.
A rehabilitation center for narcotic addicts has also been established.
There is also a psychiatry center.
We must also take into account that three are also public health
services under other ministries. There is Srinakarin hospital set up by
Khon Kaen University. There is also Kai Sripachalin military hospital.
(There is one public health service center set up by the municipality
itself.) Additionally Public Health Ministry has nine academic centers.
We also need to note that there are seven private public health
hospitals, alongside many clinics, pharmacies and drug stores.
If we look into the structure of public health service within Khon Kaen
Municipality we have to recognize that there are two separate sectors.
One deals with Public Health and Environment Promotion. Under this
sector these are three sub sectors each with a cluster of concerns. The
sub sector on Health Promotion has three units each dealing
respectively with (i) health promotion (ii) family health care (iii)
academic matters and planning. The three units under the second sub
sector of Prevention and Contagious Diseases, deal respectively with
(i) preventive work (ii) contagious diseases and (iii) prevention, and
rehabilitation of narcotic addicts. The sub sector concentrating on
promotion of the environment has four units, each unit dealing
respectively with (i) sanitation (ii) environment (iii) environmental
garbage system and (iv) pollution control.
To
Top
Concepts and policies for health care services as
held by:
(a) political and administrative leaders;
In spite of the general economic situation in the country, the forward
look and planning of the political and administrative leaders had
upheld the goals of public health care and services. Objective
observers could also note that progressive concepts and policies
continue to be pursued by the successive national and administrative
leaders concerned.
Taking the ideals and targets regarding primary health in the ninth
plan alone, some emphases can be listed:
Planning to make the health services suitable to
the way of the life of the poor, and to have such services available
widely:
Developing a ‘caring society’ so that attention
may be given to ensure that there is mutual concern for the needs among
the members of the communities facing different kinds of challenges;
Adapting state management systems to enhance the
creation of opportunities for the poor;
Promoting participation by the people in each
locality in determining the priorities and services needing to be
provided, or challenges attended to, according to the experience and
perspectives of those who after all are the key stake-holders to secure
the needed solutions.
Extending, in view of all the fore-going, the
efficient health insurance coverage and making it accessible to, all
members of different localities on an equitable basis.
(b) Concepts and policies for public health care and services as held
by health service providers (doctors, nurses and public health
officials) at various levels:
It can be assumed that the concepts and policies for health care and
public health services of doctors, nurses and public health officials
in the province are much influenced by the leaders and policy-makers at
the national levels. The growth in the number of health service
providers partly reflects the quality and increased availability of the
services being provided. Of course, the growth of population in the
province also leads to the necessity of increase in health clinic (159
in 1981 to 250in 1997) and the number of service providers (1926
persons in the year 1981 to 2994 persons in the year 1997). Though the
figures include both private and public sectors, facilities and
personnel related to the latter predominate.
The rate of infant as well as maternal mortality in the province is low
in comparison with, or in terms of, the standards of other developing
countries. We may conclude that generally speaking the concepts and
policies of the health service providers at various levels were
progressive and in line with national goals (esp. those of the Ninth
National Economic and Social development Plan). We may also deduce that
there implementation of the concepts and policies have been commendable
in producing the improved results.
(c) Perception and satisfaction levels of users or consumers of the
health services:
Again, on the basis of data collected and the visible results, it is
not unreasonable to conclude that the users or consumers of the health
services have a positive perception and acceptable level of
satisfaction concerning the health care they received.
To
Top
Particularly in the matter of reproductive health
the fact that there is increased practice of family planning indicates
that the rate of its acceptance by the user of health care services is
high. Information about marriage, sex and family planning belong
culturally to sensitive and very private sharing practice.
Khon Kaen Province’s record of progress in the health of mother and
child, in family planning and dissemination of sex education implies
that those at the receiving end of public health care services find
them satisfactory and desirable.
Referring to the conclusions reached by Dr. Chuanchom in her research
work of reproductive health in Thailand the situation of health care
and services in the province can be understood as providing a positive
level of satisfaction by the users or consumers. We can say that the
scope of the work concerning reproductive health begins at birth and
continue till death. The quality of pre-natal care for safe birth, and
post-natal care for e healthy growth a child are important. So also is
sex education, marriage counseling and information on family planning.
In all these matter those in Khon Kean Province both in terms of policy
makers, the providers of health care services, as well as the consumers
or users of the services, all seem to be doing well as we look at the
available data and the responses to questionnaire distributed to the
relevant members of the urban community.
To
Top
III. Research Methodology
3.1 Study design
This study was a descriptive research, conducted
to study the reproductive health status and primary health care in
urban setting by surveying the opinions of 346 people who live in Khon
Kean Municipality areas. This included interviewing 18 health care
providers and administrators in Khon Kean Municipality Health Services
Center (MHSC). A total of 364 respondents questionnaire was collected
for quantitative and qualitative data during February to March of the
year 2002.
3.2 Study population
The target population included people who lived
in the community of Khon Kaen Municipality, health service providers
and administrators oh Khon Kean Municipality.
3.3 Sample description
Regarding sample selection, it used purposive
sampling with a total of 364 cases. The sample selection was performed
as follows:
3.3.1 Selecting who have received health care
service from a municipality health center. There were 202 respondents
from khon Kaen Municipality Health Center, Noonchai Health Center,
Noontan Health Center and Mitthaparb Health Center.
3.3.2 Selecting 144 people who have received
health care services from a community Primary Health Care Center under
the responsibility of the Municipality Health center in 3.3.1.
3.3.3 selecting 12 health service providers
working in the Municipality Health Center in 3.3.1. They consisted of
physicians, pharmacist and professional nurses.
3.3.4 Selecting 6 administrators of Khon Kean
Municipality. They included the Secretary of the Municipality, Deputy
Secretary of the Municipality, Chairman of the Municipality Council,
Vice Chairman of the Municipality council and Municipal Counselor of
the Financial Office.
To
Top
3.4 Research instrument
The research instrument in this study consisted
of three components as follows:
3.4.1 The health opinion survey of people in
urban setting was composed of 4 major parts:
Part 1 General characteristics of the respondents included gender, age,
religion, education level, occupation, married status and family income
per month.
Part 2 Reproductive health behavior of married respondents living with
spouse and aged 15-49 years old.
Part 3 The opinion of the respondents is using the government health
center in urban settings.
Part 4 The opinions about types of health system management and health
service needs of respondents.
3.4.2 Interview of health service providers
about health opinions of people in urban settings. There were five
opened ended questions.
3.4.3 Interview of administrators about health
opinions of people in urban settings. There were seven opened ended
questions.
3.5 Test for the quality of research
instrument
Regarding the research instruments of the three
components mentioned above, the questionnaires were piloted on a
similar study population. Then it was revised and some questions were
improved for validity and appropriate questions.
3.6 Data collection
1. Preparing the community by informing health
officers, community leaders and Village Health Volunteers.
2. Assistant researchers such as lectures and nursing student of Khon
Kean Nursing College were trained and practiced using the survey before
data collecting. This was supervised by lecturer as an assistant
researcher. For the interview of health service providers and
administrators, the lecture would be the interviewer.
3.7 Data analysis
3.7.1 General Characteristics
of respondents including age, gender, education level, occupation,
married status and family income per month were analyzed and presented
in percentage.
3.7.2 Reproductive health behavior, the
opinions of the respondents in using public health center in urban
settings and the opinions about types of health system management and
health service needs of the respondents were analyzed and presented in
percentage.
3.7.3 For the qualitative data, the health
opinions of health service providers in urban settings and municipality
administrators were analyzed according to Suphang Chanatawanich (1993),
the details are described as follows:
A. The health opinion framework was constructed.
B. Tested validity by interviewing to be sure of identical data.
C. Basic data analyzed for quality and competition every time after
receiving information for the further data collection.
D. Summarized temporary data as brief concepts and related data basic.
E. Summarized data by collecting temporary data that had been tested
and confirmed for correction by the health opinion framework of health
service providers and municipality administrators. It included problems
and health situation in urban settings, medical and health service
management, primary health care management, and the agreement of
primary health care elements in implementation with the current
situation. The necessity of health volunteers, problems of environment
and quality of life in urban settings, reproductive health problems,
the necessity of reproductive health services and satisfaction level of
health service providers.
To
Top
IV. Results
This research studied Reproductive Health Status
and Primary HealthCare in urban settings by surveying the opinions of
health service users and providers, and health status opinions of the
Khon Kean Municipality Administrators. After data collection and
analysis, the results were organized as follows:
4.1 General characteristics of the respondents
4.2 Reproductive health behavior of married respondents living with
spouse and aged 15-49 years who used health services at the
Municipality Health Services Center (MHSC) and Community Primary Health
Care Center (CPHCC)
4.3 The opinions of the health service users in urban settings at the
Municipality health Services Center and Community Primary Health Care
Center
4.4 The Opinions of health system management and health service needs
of the users at the Municipality Health Services Center and Community
Primary health Care Center
4.5 The health opinions of health service providers in urban settings.
4.6 The health opinions of Khon Kaen Municipality Administrators.
4.1 The general characteristics of the
respondents
The respondents totaled 346 people and were
divided into two groups. There were 202 health service users at the
MHSC and 144 health service users at the CPHCC in the catchment areas
of MHSC.
The respondents were mostly female and Buddhists. Their educational
level was primary school level, the age group of the respondents who
used health services at the MHSC was 45-49 years (23.9%) and the age
group of the respondents who used health services at the CPHCC was
30-34 years (24.3%). Both of them were close; 36 and 35 years of
average age (Table1).
The MHSC users were mostly housewives (30.2%), but the CPHCC users were
business owners and traders (36.1%). Both groups were married women and
had income less than 5,000 baht, but the average income was nearly
7,000 and 6,642 baht (Table 1)
To
Top
Table 1 General characteristics of the
respondent
| Characteristics |
MHSC users
(n=202) |
CPHCC users
(n=202) |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
|
Sex
|
Male
Female |
27
175
|
13.4
86.6 |
32
112
|
22.2
77.8 |
|
Age
|
15-19 years
20-24 years
25-29 years
30-34 years
35-39 years
40-44 years
45-49 years |
8
16
24
36
34
36
48 |
4
8
12
18.0
17.0
17.9
23.9 |
3
14
13
35
30
25
24 |
2.1
9.8
9.0
24.3
20.8
17.3
16.7 |
|
Average age
|
X=36 yrs. |
X= 35 yrs. |
|
Religion
|
Buddhist
Islam
Christian
|
197
1
4 |
97.5
0.5
2.0 |
141
-
3 |
97.9
-
2.1 |
|
Education
|
No education
Primary
Secondary
Bachelor |
9
122
59
- |
4.5
60.4
29.2
- |
9
91
39
5 |
6.3
63.2
27.1
3.4` |
|
Occupation
|
Government officers
Farmer
Housewife
Business owner/trader
Laborer
Factory/company worker
Students |
10
4
61
60
49
15
3 |
5.0
2.0
30.2
29.7
24.3
7.4
1.5 |
4
2
31
52
50
3
2 |
2.8
1.4
21.5
36.1
34.7
1.4
2.1 |
|
Marital status
|
Single
Married
Divorced/separated
Widow
|
8
183
8
3 |
4.0
90.6
4.0
1.5 |
6
128
10
- |
4.2
88.9
6.9
- |
|
Income per month
|
< 5,000 baht
5,000-10,000 baht
10,001-15,000 baht
15,001-20,000 baht
20,001-25,000 baht
25,001-30,000 baht
30,001-35,000 baht
35,001-40,000 baht |
92
86
24
-
-
-
-
-
|
45.5
42.6
11.9
-
-
-
-
- |
76
53
6
5
1
1
-
2 |
52.8
36.8
4.1
3.5
0.7
0.7
-
1.4 |
| Average income per month |
7000 baht |
6642 baht |
4.2 reproductive health behavior of married
respondents living with spouse and aged 15-49 years who used health
services at the municipality health services center and community
primary health care center.
The number of married respondents living with
their spouse and aged 15-49 years, using health services at the MHSC
was 183 at the CPHCC it was 128. The reproductive health behaviors were
as follows:
The first age at marriage groups of the users at the MHSC and the CPHCC
was mostly 20-24 years (44.8% and 46.1%). Both groups never had an
abortion (76.0% and 72.6%), but for abortion only one time, both groups
found that the number of cases were nearly the same (20.2% and 20.3%),
in Table 2.
To
Top
The MHSC users practicing the contraceptive
method were 66.1%, it was less than the CPHCC users, which was 73.4%.
The most common contraceptive method was sterilization (60.3% and
47.9%) and they used this kind of service at the government hospital
(71.1% and 64.9%), in Table 2.
Regarding gestation within the past 3 years, it was found that 25.1% of
the MHSC users and 30.5% of the CPHCC users, used mostly Ante-Natal
Care services (91.3% and 94.9%). However, the second group it was more
than the number of ANC service users in the CPHCC group, which was only
1-3 times (Table 2)
The MHSC users comprised 91.3% while the CPHCC users comprised 100%.
They used the delivery service at the government hospital. The main
reason for delivery service use was convenience (80.4% and 72.9%). The
short distance between their houses and the hospital were 56.5% and
59.5%, while safety was 56.5% and 54.1%. For Post-Natal Care Service,
the MHSC users (58.7%) received this kind of service less than the
CPHCC users (73.0%), in Table 2.
The Papanicolaou Test in women over 35 years, it was found that the
MHSC users (66.1%) and CPHCC users (62.0%), both received this kind of
test, and they had never contracted AIDS or Sexual Transmitted Diseases
(STDs).
The birth weight of the children in the MHSC users was mostly
3,000-5,500 grams (45.7%), and in the CPHCC it was 2,500-3,000 grams
(62.2%). Both of the mother groups used only breast-feeding, but the
MHSC group was less than the CPHCC group (54.4% and 67.6%).
To
Top
Table 2 Reproductive health behavior of
married respondents living with spouse and aged 15-49 years who used
health services at the municipality health services center and
community primary health care center
| Reproductive Health Behavior |
MHSC users |
CPHCC users |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
|
1. First age at marriage
|
< 15 years
15-19 years
20-24 years
25-29 years
30-34 years
35-39 years
|
4
62
82
29
4
2 |
2.2
33.9
44.8
15.8
2.2
1.1 |
3
48
59
17
-
1 |
2.3
37.5
46.1
13.3
-
0.8 |
| |
n=183 |
n=128 |
|
2. Abortion
|
Never
1 times
2 times
3 times
4 times
|
139
37
6
1
- |
76.0
20.2
3.3
0.5
- |
93
26
7
1
1 |
72.6
20.3
5.5
0.8
0.8 |
| |
n=183 |
n=128 |
|
3. Contraceptive practice
|
No practice
Practiced
Getting pregnant
|
57
121
5 |
31.2
66.1
2.7 |
32
94
2 |
25.0
73.4
16.0 |
| |
n= 183 |
n=128 |
|
4. Current Contraceptive method
|
Sterilization
Oral pill
Injection
IUD
Condom
Norplant
Safe period |
73
24
13
5
4
1
1 |
60.3
19.8
10.7
4.1
3.3
0.8
0.8 |
45
24
14
10
-
1
- |
47.9
25.5
14.9
10.6
-
1.1
- |
| |
n= 121 |
n=94 |
|
5. Contraceptive service facility
|
Government hospital
Municipality health center
Private clinic
Drug store
Other
|
86
19
8
8
4
|
71.1
15.7
6.6
6.6
3.3 |
61
19
3
11
- |
64.9
20.2
3.2
11.7
- |
| |
n=121 |
n=94 |
|
6. Gestation within the past 3 years
|
Yes
No |
46
137 |
25.1
74.9 |
39
89 |
30.5
69.5 |
| |
n=183 |
n=94 |
|
7. Ante-Natal Care Service
|
Yes
No |
42
4 |
91.3
8.7 |
37
2 |
94.9
5.1 |
| |
n=46 |
n=39 |
|
8. Number of ANC service
|
1-3 times
4-6 times
7-9 times
10-12 times
Don’t know |
13
6
5
18
- |
30.9
14.3
11.9
42.9
- |
16
6
4
3
8 |
43.2
16.2
10.9
8.1
21.6 |
| |
n=42 |
n=37 |
|
9. Delivery facility
|
Government hospital
Municipality health center
Private clinic
Health promotion center |
42
-
1
3 |
91.3
-
2.2
6.5 |
37
-
-
- |
100.0
-
-
- |
|
n=46 |
n=37 |
|
10. Reason for using delivery service
at the hospital
|
Convenient
Short distance
Paid less/free of charge
Safety
Modern equipment
|
37
26
15
26
19 |
80.4
56.5
32.6
56.5
41.3 |
27
22
-
20
- |
72.9
59.5
-
54.1
- |
| |
n=46 |
n=37 |
|
11. Post-Natal Care service
|
Yes
No |
27
19 |
58.7
41.3 |
27
10 |
73.0
27.0 |
|
n=46 |
n=37 |
|
12. Pap Smear test
|
Yes
Someone tested
No |
78
5
35 |
66.1
4.2
29.7 |
49
7
23 |
62.0
8.9
29.1 |
|
n=118 |
n=79 |
|
13. Family member had contracted AIDS
or STD
|
Yes
No |
200
2 |
99.0
1.0 |
141
3 |
97.9
2.1 |
| |
n=202 |
n=144 |
|
14. Birth weight
|
< 2,500 grams
2,501-3000 grams
3,001-3,500 grams
3,5001-4000 grams
|
3
19
21
3 |
6.5
41.3
45.7
6.5 |
2
23
8
4 |
5.4
62.2
21.6
10.8 |
| |
n=46 |
n=37 |
|
15. Breast-feeding
|
No
Yes
Breast feeding & instant milk |
6
25
15 |
13.0
54.4
32.6 |
5
25
7 |
13.5
67.6
18.9 |
| |
n=46 |
n=37 |
To
Top
For immunization of children under 1 year in the
municipality health centers, it was found that there were 14 children
less than 1 year who had completely received vaccination. They were for
BCG, Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus, OPV and Rubella, almost all were
vaccinated (92.9% and 90.0%). For the Rubella vaccine 4 children should
have received this vaccine, but only 3 children had received it
(75.0%), in Table 3. The Community Primary Health Care Center found
that there were 16 children under 1 year had completely received the
BCG vaccine, 81.3% received the Hepatitis B vaccine, DPT and OPV were
received by 75%. The Rubella vaccine was received by only 50.0% (Table
4).
Table 3 The immunization of children under 1
year in the municipality health service center
| Immunization |
Complete |
Incomplete |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
BCG (n=14)
DPT (n=14)
OPV (n=14)
Hepatitis (n=14)
Rubella (n=14)
|
14
13
13
10
3 |
100.0
92.9
92.9
90.9
75.0 |
-
1
1
1
1 |
-
7.1
7.1
9.1
25.0 |
Table 4 The immunization of children under 1
year in the community primary health care center
| Immunization |
Complete |
Incomplete |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
BCG (n=16)
DPT (n=16)
OPV (n=16)
Hepatitis (n=16)
Rubella (n=16)
Encephalitis
|
16
12
12
13
1
3 |
100.0
75.0
75.0
81.3
50.0
18.8 |
-
4
4
3
1
13 |
-
25.0
25.0
18.8
50.0
81.3 |
To
Top
Regarding the immunization in children 1-6 years,
it was found that the most of them, 91 children in the municipality
health service center had been completely vaccinated for BCG, DPT, OPV,
Hepatitis B and Rubella. The Encephalitis vaccine was received by only
78.0% (Table 5).
The immunization in children 1-4 years in the primary health care
center showed that 68 children had completely received BCG and
Hepatitis B vaccines. The DPT and OPV vaccines were received by 94.1%.
Rubella vaccine and Encephalitis vaccine were received by 88.2% and
76.5%, respectively (Table 6).
Table 5 The immunization of children 1-6 years
in the municipality health service center
| Immunization |
Complete |
Incomplete |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
BCG (n=16)
DPT (n=16)
OPV (n=16)
Hepatitis (n=16)
Rubella (n=16)
Encephalitis
|
90
90
90
88
90
71 |
98.9
98.9
98.9
96.7
98.9
78.0 |
1
1
1
3
1
20
|
1.1
1.1
1.1
3.3
1.1
22.0 |
Table 6 The immunization of children 1-6
years in the community primary health care center
| Immunization |
Complete |
Incomplete |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
BCG (n=16)
DPT (n=16)
OPV (n=16)
Hepatitis (n=16)
Rubella (n=16)
Encephalitis |
68
64
64
68
60
52 |
100.0
94.1
64.1
100.0
88.2
76.5 |
-
4
4
-
8
16 |
-
5.9
5.9
-
11.8
23.5 |
To
Top
The health facility, to which the parents brought
their children to receive immunization, was examined in the MHSC and
the CPHCC. The health service behaviors of the users were quite
similar. Most of the parents brought their children to the MHSC (59.3%)
and CPHCC (54.4%) to receive vaccination. The second place was
government hospital, 38.5% and 44.1%. Also there were a few cases that
went to private clinic, 2.2% and 1.5% (table 7).
The reason why the parents brought their children to receive
immunization at the MHSC and CPHCC was similar; the main reason was
convenience (92.3% and 85.3%), the second reason was only 16.5% and
20.6% thinking about the modern equipment (Table 8).
Table 7 The health facility used by parents to
bring their children for immunization
| Health Facility |
MHSC users
(n=91) |
CPHCC users
(n=68) |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
Hospital
Health Service Center
Private Clinic
|
35
54
2
|
38.5
59.3
2.2
|
30
37
1
|
44.1
54.4
1.5 |
Table 8 The reason for using the health
facility for immunization
| Reason |
MHSC users
(n=91) |
CPHCC users
(n=68) |
| number |
percent |
number |
percent |
Convenience
Short distance
Paid less/free of charge
Safely
Modern equipment |
84
69
38
43
15 |
92.3
75.8
41.8
47.3
16.5 |
58
49
33
25
14
|
85.3
72.1
48.5
36.7
20.6 |
To
Top
4.3 The opinions of the health service users
in urban settings at the municipality health services center and
community primary health care center
4.3.1 Examining the opinions of
the health service users in the urban settings at the MHSC from 202
people, it was seen that most of them thought that it was very
convenient for traveling to use the provided services, appropriate
service period, enough services and inexpensive cost for treatment,
81.2% up to 95.5% (Table 9).
For the Health personnel’s skill, most of them thought that the health
personnel had good services; it was 71.8% up to 79.2%. These kinds of
services included diagnosis, physical check up, treatment, health
education and information, disease control and prevention, community
activities (village development, fund administration) and consultant.
The referral system, consumer protection, AIDS control and home visit
activities was 40.9% up to 63.4% and laboratory practice was only 53.5%
(Table 9).
Their opinions about equipment and medical supplies in the MHSC were
that the quality of that equipment was good, the quantity was enough
and modern for used. Most of their opinions were 60.4% up to 62.9%
(Table 9).
Regarding inside and outside condition areas of the MHSC were good
(84.7% and 87.1%), and the numbers of health personnel were enough
(69.3%). The health personnel had a good relationship and skill (82.2%
and 75.7%), in Table 9.
To
Top
Table 9 The opinions of the health service
users in urban settings at the municipality health service center (n=
202)
| Opinion |
number |
percent |
|
1.Convenient for traveling to use the
provided services
|
193 |
95.5 |
|
2. Appropriate service period
|
167 |
82.7 |
|
3. Enough services
|
164 |
81.2 |
|
4. Inexpensive cost for treatment
|
166 |
82.2 |
|
5. Health personnel’s skill
|
| |
Diagnosis/physical check up
Laboratory practice
Treatment
Referral system
Health education and information
Diseases control and prevention
Consumer protection
AIDS control
Home visit
Community activities
Consultant
|
145
108
158
127
160
158
123
128
128
143
146 |
71.8
53.5
78.2
62.9
79.2
78.2
60.9
63.4
63.4
70.8
72.3 |
|
6. Equipment and supplies
|
| |
Enough
Good condition
Modern
|
122
127
126 |
60.4
62.9
62.4 |
|
7. Good condition areas of the MHSC
|
| |
Inside
Outside
|
171
176 |
84.7
87.1 |
|
8. Health Personnel practice
|
| |
Enough number
Good relationship
Good skill
|
140
166
153 |
69.3
82.2
75.7 |
4.3.2 Regarding the opinions of
the health service users in urban settings at the CPHCC, from 144
people, most of their opinions were that it was very convenient for
traveling to use the provided services (82.6%), service period was
appropriate (72.9%), but there was only 51.4% for sufficient services
(Table 10).
For the village health volunteer’s skill at the CPHCC, it was found
that the first performance was conduction meetings for villagers
(66.0%), the second was village development (58.0% up to 63.9%) such as
garbage disposal, local disease surveillance (mosquito breeding place
destruction, stool collection for examination, and bacteria checking in
the water) and nutrition. For the other activities such as physical
check up (measure blood pressure, check fever, examine urine for
diabetes), treatment, first aid, referral system, health education and
information, and AIDS control (condom distribution and health
education), the performance of village health volunteer in these
activities was rated quite low (43.1% up to 54.2%), in Table 10.
To
Top
The opinions about equipment and medical supplies
at the CPHCC were that they were inadequate (19.4%). The equipment
condition was modern and viewed by only 20.8% and 18.1% (Table10).
Opinions on the inside and outside condition areas of the CPHCC were
quite good (63.2% and 62.5%). The village health volunteer performance
had good relationship (70.1%), the number of village health volunteer
was adequate (56.3%) and their skills were good (39.6%), in Table 10.
Table 10 The opinions of the health service
users in urban settings at the community primary health care center (n=
144)
| Opinion |
number |
percent |
|
1.Convenient for traveling to use the
provided services
|
119 |
82.6 |
|
2. Appropriate service period
|
105 |
72.9 |
|
3. Enough services
|
74 |
51.4 |
|
4. Village health volunteer’s skill
|
| |
Physical check up
Treatment/first aid
Referral system
Health education and information
Local diseases surveillance
AIDS control
Village development
Nutrition
Conducting meeting
|
65
62
62
86
92
78
92
83
95 |
45.1
43.1
43.1
59.7
63.9
54.2
63.9
58.0
66.0 |
|
5. Equipment and supplies
|
| |
Enough
Good condition
Modern
|
28
30
26 |
19.4
20.8
18.1 |
|
6. Good condition areas of the CPHCC
|
| |
Inside
Outside
|
91
90 |
63.2
62.5 |
|
7. Village health volunteer’s
performance
|
|
|
| |
Enough number
Good relationship
Good skill
|
81
101
57
|
56.3
70.1
39.6 |
To Top
4.4 The opinions of health system management
and health service needs of the users at the municipality health
services center and community primary health care center
4.4.1 Regarding the opinions of health system
management and health service needs of the users at the municipality
health center from 202 people, most of them thought that the management
of government health services in many levels gave equal opportunity for
treatment and convenient services (84.2% and 86.1%). Health facilities
had enough services, covered population needs and had a good quality of
services (74.3%, 73.8% and 74.3%). Ongoing services such as referral
system, resources management for services such as health manpower,
equipment, supply and efficient health problem solving in the community
were rated (64.4%, 66.8% and 69.3%), in Table 11
Table 11 The opinions of the health system
management of users at the municipality health services center and
hospital (n=202)
| Opinion |
number |
percent |
Chance for equal treatment
Adequate services
Good coverage of population needs
Convenient services
Effective of solving health problems in the community
Good quality of services
Good ongoing services
Good resources management for services |
170
150
149
174
140
150
130
135 |
84.2
74.2
73.8
86.1
69.3
74.3
64.4
66.8 |
To Top
The health service needs in the community at the
MHSC perceived that there were many diseases, there were AIDS,
nutrition, safe water, maternal and child health, health education,
disease control and prevention, essential drugs and immunization (80.2%
up to 94.6%). Ratings of accident prevention, mental health, dental
health, family planning, drug addiction and services for the elderly
were 73.8% up to 79.2% and services for people with disability and
consumer protection were rated low (68.3% and 66.8%), in Table 12.
Most of them thought that every provided health services in the
community was a necessary services (99.0% up to 99.5%), the quality of
services were rated 80.2% up to 93.1%, including disease control and
prevention, family planning, basic essential drugs and maternal and
child health and immunization. Drug addiction, dental health, AIDS,
services for the elderly, nutrition, environmental health, safe water
and health education were rated 71.8% up to 78.7% while consumer
protection, services for people with disability, accident prevention
and mental health were rated quite low (58.5% up to 67.7%), in Table
12.
Table 12 The health service needs in the
community of users at the municipality health service center and
hospital (n= 202)
| Service |
Community
percent |
Quality
percent |
Need
percent |
Family planning
Maternal and child health
Immunization
Health education
Safe water
Essential drugs
Disease control and prevent
Mental health
Dental health
Consumer protection
Nutrition
Accident prevention
Drug addiction
AIDS
Services for the elderly
Services for people with disability
Environment health |
78.2
83.7
94.6
84.2
83.7
89.1
84.1
73.8
77.2
66.8
81.2
73.8
78.7
80.2
79.2
68.3
82.7 |
80.2
82.2
93.1
78.7
77.7
80.7
80.2
67.7
72.6
58.5
76.7
67.3
71.8
72.8
74.8
61.4
76.2 |
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.5
99.0
99.0 |
To Top
4.4.2 Regarding the opinions of
health system management and health service needs of the users at the
CPHCC from 144 people, it was found that the government health service
management was provided at the village level. This was the CPHCC
managed by the village health volunteer. Their opinions were that they
had a chance for equal treatment (74.3%), good coverage of population
needs (81.9%), and adequate services, convenient services and
effectiveness of solving problem in community were rated 59.0% up to
63.2%. The quality of services, ongoing services such as health
manpower, equipment and medical supply were rated quite low (32.2% up
to 47.9%), in table 13.
Table 13 The opinions of the health system
management of users at the community primary health care center (n=
144)
| Opinion |
number |
percent |
Chance for equal treatment
Adequate services
Good coverage of population needs
Convenient services
Effectiveness of solving health problems in the community
Good quality of services
Good ongoing services
Good resources management for services |
107
91
118
85
86
60
69
49 |
74.3
63.2
81.9
59.0
59.7
41.6
47.9
34.2 |
Regarding the health services needs of the users
at the CPHCC, it was found that 81.3% up to 84.0 was rated for AIDS,
health education and immunization. Environmental health, safe water,
service for elderly and drug addict were rated 72.2% up to 79.2%.
Consumer protection, family planning, maternal and child health, dental
health, services for people with disability, disease control and
prevention, accident prevention, nutrition, essential drugs and mental
health were rated 43.8% up to 69.4%.
To Top
Rating were that all provided health services
were necessary (97.2% up to 98.6%), quality of services were rated
64.6% up to 67.4%, including drug addiction, AIDS, immunization and
health education. Essential drugs, accident prevention, environmental
health, nutrition, mental health, safe water and services for the
elderly were rated 50.0% up to 59.0%. Consumer protection, services for
people with disability, family planning, maternal and child health,
dental health and disease control and prevention were quite low (33.3%
up to 47.9%), in Table 14.
Table 14 The health service needs in the
community of users at the community primary health care center (n= 144)
| Service |
Community
percent |
Quality
percent |
Need
percent |
Family planning
Maternal and child health
Immunization
Health education
Safe water
Essential drugs
Disease control and prevent
Mental health
Dental health
Consumer protection
Nutrition
Accident prevention
Drug addiction
AIDS
Services for the elderly
Services for people with disability
Environment health
|
52.1
52.1
84.0
83.3
73.6
68.8
66.0
69.4
55.6
43.8
68.1
66.0
79.2
81.3
77.1
55.6
72.2
|
45.2
45.2
66.7
67.4
56.9
50.0
47.9
56.3
45.8
33.8
54.2
52.1
64.6
64.6
59.0
43.8
54.2
|
97.2
97.2
97.9
98.6
98.6
98.6
97.2
98.6
97.9
97.2
97.9
97.2
97.9
97.9
97.9
98.6
98.6 |
4.5 The opinions of the health status of
health service providers in urban settings
The opinions of the health status of health
service providers in urban settings were taken from 12 people, the
physician, pharmacist, and professional nurse by interviewing and using
open-ended questions. The interview questions concerned health service
coverage, reproductive health, and satisfaction of service provider
with health services, problems, barriers and the other needs for
practice. The results were as follows:
4.5.1 Their opinions about medical problems
and people’s health in urban setting included:
Congested community and pollution such as air,
water, garbage and waste, causing respiratory and digestive system
diseases
Accident and traffic problems, high competition,
causing stress, mental problems, drug addiction and high mortality.
Chronic diseases and heredopathia such as
diabetes, hypertension, arthritis.
Influencing behavior such as eating behavior,
taking care of themselves, lack of health promotion and consumer
protection.
Malnutrition
The important problems in reproductive health was a lack of knowledge,
consultants and sex education in the reproductive age, having sex at on
early age, unsafe sex, unwanted pregnancy and child, illegal abortion
and STD contraction. It should have cooperation from many organizations.
To Top
4.5.2 The opinions about current
medical services and health and efficient problem solving according to
the policy included:
Current medical service and health could solve some problems
It was a passive practice, problem solving did
not hit the point, and many people received illness from their
behaviors. The most important was the people should have self-care and
health promotion to prevent these problems.
The health services for people still had
discrimination and quality of services were not different.
The ratio between the users and providers was
very different, especially the small health service center, where
health promotion could not be practiced.
4.5.3 The opinions of current medical service
and health in urban settings included:
Use active practice and manage the ratio between
the users and providers Emphasize practice in community.
Have good coordination with many organizations.
Improve the health service system such as
convenient accessibility, good services, good relation between the
users and providers, reduction of unnecessary processes and efficiency.
4.5.4 The opinions of reproductive health
services included:
Stipulate that for solving problems and promoting
reproductive health by involved persons such as from education,
society, economics and health sectors, there should be reproductive
health curriculum for the pupils in their school or university.
Control teenage behavior.
Parents should take care of their children.
Provide more information about reproductive
health at all ages in their schools and communities.
4.5.5 The opinions of satisfaction with
current practice, needs, problems and barriers in their jobs included:
The regulation did not match with practice or the
real situation.
The development did not last long, budget and
manpower did not match with the real situation.
The staff practice did not match with the real
situation.
No incentive for staff.
Providers needs included:
Manipulate the ratio of the users and providers.
Improve management, regulations and rules.
Create incentives.
Have good attitude.
To Top
4.6 Health status opinion of the Khon Kaen
Municipality Administrator
The opinions of health status by Khon kaen
Municipality Administrator included 6 people; they were the Secretary
of the Municipality, Deputy Secretary of the Municipality, Chairman and
Vice Chairman of the Municipality Council and the Municipal Counselor.
The interview questions concerned health service coverage such as
health problems in urban settings, medical service and health
management in urban settings, current primary health care activities,
village health volunteer in urban settings, environmental problems in
urban settings and quality of people in urban setting indicators.
4.6.1 The opinions of health problems in urban
settings and target included:
The current problems were drug addiction, pollution such as air, water,
garbage, toxins, and chemicals. People could not access basic health
services. Treatment was more than health promotion.
4.6.2 The opinions of current medical service
and health agreed with the real situation and included:
Emphasize health promotion prevention
rehabilitation more than treatment
Cooperate with involved organization
Decentralize
Develop of treatment and new knowledge
Improve referral system improvement
Coordinate
To Top
4.6.3 The opinions of primary
health care management in urban settings included:
Capitation
Planning consideration system
Cooperation and coordination
4.6.4 The opinions of primary
health care elements in urban settings in the current situation were in
terms of agreeable elements and its necessity. Municipality
administrators thought that all elements were necessary and agreed with
the current situation. It should be completed and followed-up
continuously.
4.6.5 The opinions of village health volunteer
in urban setting and performance included:
It was necessary to have village health volunteers because they were
the people in the community. They could know, understand and cooperate
with the staff. We should have training for them to improve their
knowledge and skill.
4.6.6 The opinions of environmental health in
urban settings included:
The environmental problems were pollution from garbage, water, traffic
and smoke. The weak law could not punish the violators. We should
encourage the people to improve their environment.
4.6.7 The opinions of quality of people in
urban settings included:
The quality of people should be happy with healthy and good mental
condition. The good conditions of people were happy family and
community, good health and education, sufficient income and equality in
their society.
V. Conclusion
5.1 Conclusion
This study was a descriptive research aimed
investigating reproductive health status and urban primary health care
in Khon Kaen Municipality from February- March 2002.
The largest population was 202 clients at the municipality Health
services Center (MHSC), 144 clients at the Community Primary health
Care Center (CPHCC), 12 health providers at MHSC and 6 administrators
of the Khon Kaen Municipality, the total target population was 364
persons.
The data wee colleted both by quantitative and qualitative methods by
using structured questionnaires consisting of survey forms on health
opinions of people in urban settings for clients at the MHSC and CPHCC
and interview forms on health opinions of people in urban settings for
health providers and municipality administrators. Percentages have been
used to analyze quantitative data and the analysis guideline of
Chantawanich (1993) has been used for qualitative data.
Research results were as follows:
5.1.1 Reproductive health behavior
The target population who used health care services at the MHSC and
CPHCC found that the first marriage was at 20-24 years. Mostly there
were no abortion and among people who have, mostly it was only once.
Most of the respondents practiced contraceptive methods, the popular
method was sterilization at a government hospital (Table2).
Regarding pregnancy within the past three years,
clients who visited the services at the MHSC and CPHCC had similar
pregnancy rates at 25.1% and 30.5% accordingly. Almost all pregnant
women visited an Ante-natal care unit; however, the number of visits of
clients at the NHSC was 10-12 times, while the clients at the CPHCC was
1-3 times. Both groups preferred to deliver at the hospital for the
reason of convenience, nearness to house and safety. Post-natal care of
clients at the MHSC and CPHCC was 58.7% and 73.0% respectively and
women 35 years and higher were tested for cancer and female genitalia.
It was found that the number was similar, 66.7% of clients at the MHSC
and 62.0% of clients at the CPHCC. Almost all family member of both
groups had never contracted a sexually transmitted disease (Table 2).
The weight of newborn babies at the MHSC was over
3,000 to 3,500 grams, much more than at the CPHCC, which was only 2,500
to 3,000 grams. Breast feeding of clients at the MHSC was less than the
CPHCC (Table 2).
All children under 1 year of both groups received BCG vaccination;
however, vaccinations for Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus,
Poliomyelitis, Hepatitis and Rubella for children at the MHSC were
received much more than children at the CPHCC (Table 5). Almost
children 1-6 years at the MHSC received BCG, Diphtheria, Pertussis,
Tetanus, Poliomyelitis, Hepatitis and Rubella vaccines much more than
children at the CPHCC. Regarding Encephalitis vaccinations, they were
both alike, 78.0% and 76.5% (Tables 5 and 6). Both groups preferred to
go to the MHSC for child immunization because it is near the house and
convenient (Tables 7 and 8).
To Top
Opinions toward government health care services
of both groups were similar regarding convenience and appropriate
service times. The types of health care service at the CPHCC were less
than the MHSC (Table 9 and 10).
The abilities of health providers at the MHSC were rated good in terms
of diagnosis, physical check-up, treatment, suggestion, information
distribution, disease control and prevention, conducting community
activity and counseling. The capabilities of laboratory rooms at the
MHSC was rated only fair at 53.5% (Table 9). The performance of Village
Health Volunteers (VHVs) at the CPHCC work quite well in terms of
calling for village meetings. The other tasks, which wee rated only
fair were basic check-up (blood pressure, fever measurement, urine
test) treatment, first aid, referring, counseling, health education and
AIDS control (Table 10).
Regarding the adequacy of equipment, medical supplies and condition of
equipment at the MHSC, almost all respondents stated that they were
good at 60.4-62.9%. however, 18.1-20.8% of respondents at the CPHCC
thought that they were good (Tables 9 and 10). The condition of both
inside and outside areas at the MHSC were rated better than th CPHCC,
human relation and ability of health provider at the MHSC also were
rated better than the CPHCC, and 69.3% thought that there were enough
of health personnel (Table 9 and 10).
5.1.2 Opinions towards health care services
system
The health care service system at the MHSC was rated good in terms of
equal treatment, convenient services, full coverage of services,
coverage of population and quality of services. However, the continuous
services such as referral system, resource allocation on health
services in terms of staff, equipment and medical supplies including
effectiveness of health problem-solving were rated less than the other
aspects (Table 11). While health care services system at the CPHCC were
rated good, only equal treatment and coverage of population, and other
aspects such as coverage of health services, convenient services,
effectiveness of health problem solving, services quality, continuous
service and resource allocation on heath care were rated less (tables
12 and 13).
5.1.3 The needs of community health care
services
According to perception of community health care services, the
respondents at the MHSC knew that there were community health care
services with good quality and it is a requirement of community, while
the respondents at the CPHCC were less accepting of community health
care services. At the MHSC 80.2-94.6% of respondents knew about AIDS,
nutrition, clean water, mother and child health, health education,
disease control and prevention, basic essential drugs and immunization.
In addition, 73.7-79.2% of respondents knew about accident prevention,
mental health, dental health, family planning, drug addiction and
elderly services. The least known health care services were handicapped
services and consumer protection. The above-mentioned health care
services could be set up in order of best quality rated from 80.2%-
93.1% and were as follows: disease control and prevention, family
planning, basic essential drugs, mother and child health and
immunization. The second best quality, rated from 71.8%-78.7% were drug
addiction, dental health, AIDS problem and services for the elderly.
The lowest quality, rated from 58.5%-67.7% included consumer
protection, handicapped services, accident prevention and mental health
(Table 12).
To Top
The highest perception by respondents at the
CPHCC in the proportion, 87.3% to 84.0%, included AIDS, health
education and immunization. The second, in the proportion of 72.7% to
79.2% were pollution prevention, having clean water, elderly services
and drug addiction. The least known, 43.88% to 69.4%, were consumer
protection, family planning, mother and child health, dental health,
handicapped service, disease control and prevention, accident
prevention, nutrition, basic essential drugs and mental health. The
best quality of service were drug addiction and AIDS in the proportion
of 64.4% to 67.4%.
Immunization and health education were the second best, 50.0% to 59.0%,
which included only a few such as basic essential drugs, accident
prevention, pollution prevention, nutrition, mental health, having
clean water and elderly service. Consumer protection, handicapped
services. Family planning, mother and child health, mental health and
disease control and prevention were rated 33.3% to 47.9%.
The health care services mentioned above were perceived to be essential
to both groups.
5.1.4 Health opinions of health providers in
urban settings
The opinions of health providers towards the important health problem
in urban settings were follows:
Congestion problems, pollution, accident and
traffic, narcotics, stress, psychosis, malnutrition, chronic disease
and genetic disease such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension and disease
of the bones and joints.
Behavioral problems such as eating behavior and
lack of consumer protection.
Reproductive health problems such as a lack of
knowledge, counseling on sex education, adolescence do not know about
pregnancy prevention causing unwanted pregnancy, illegal abortion and
sexually transmitted diseases. At present, reproductive health services
still do not cover the problem. Also, the cooperation between inside
and outside authorized organizations to solve problems was not clear.
The providers thought that they were satisfied
with their tasks because they used their knowledge and worked closely
with the people. However, they still had some obstacles with the tasks
such as the bureaucratic system that depends on the regulation more
than production and task effectiveness. The regulation did not go along
with the performance, it only emphasized working quickly, not the
rationale. Also, human resource development and funding did not agree
with the real situation and had no sustainable development. Moreover,
the health personnel did not adjust their way of working for harmony
with the real situation including motivation for working, and did not
agree with policies and improved performance. Thus, the need for health
providers to put the right man to the right job, improving the smooth
management, promoting attitudes towards advanced performance and
strengthening people’s self-reliance and encouraging staff to work in
the community.
Current medical care services and health care
services were able to solve some problems due to defending performance,
inequity of services, different proportion of clients and providers,
especially at small health care services center. Medical services and
urban public health should be changed to agree with the policy and the
current situation. There should be clear coordination at high policy
levels for mutual understanding among the staff and easy coordination
at the implementing level, putting the right person to the right job,
including encouraging staff to work in the community. Furthermore,
improving the service system has to agree with health care insurance
policy in terms of equity, accessibility, sincere services, quality
service, accountability and decrease procedure for task effectiveness.
Reproductive health services are very essential
to take care of people’s health throughout their lives. Current
services do not cover or suit the problems. It was only a single
solution not a holistic solution. The important thing to improve is
policy identification on solution and promotion of holistic
reproductive health by mobilizing all human resources such as
educational, social, economic and public health for mutual coordination
at all levels. Regarding society, regulations have to be re-arranged to
control adolescent behavior.
To Top
5.1.5 The health opinions of
the Khon Kaen Municipality Administrators included:
They have been implementing health care services
and have had success in some aspects, the lack of success was because
it was a passive task only and emphasized treatment more than health
promotion and prevention. The important health problems are pollution,
such as air pollution, water and toxic substances. People lack health
care insurance, and have less self-reliance and more inequity.
Current medical care and health care services
have to be adjusted to agree with health care reform policy by
adjusting work procedures in the active performance aspect and
strengthening the potential of family and community to be self-reliant.
The roles of health personnel need intersectoral coordination between
organization and in the community to work closely together. The
implementation should go along with research study and bring the
research result to develop the task continuously. The roles of health
personnel at the Provincial Public health Office should be central link
between policy and local staff, also working at the policy level. Local
staff have to transfer tasks to authorized sections and have equal
decentralization both in urban and rural settings. The referral system
needs to be improved at health care service centers for continuous
care.
Cooperation and coordination among responsible
units for urban primary health care was felt to be less. The 30-baht
policy caused information systems to change all the time and increase
the workload for staff. The hospital was still centralized and the
municipality had a less active plan. However, if there is a
reengineering for new organizational structures and new roles would
mainly be based on the quality of life of the people.
Urban primary health care management should
allocated funding per head, emphasizing the people. All plans should be
proposed by responsible organizations and considered by the Provincial
Committee.
To Top
The current implementation of primary health care
elements are essential and agreeable with the real situation nowadays;
however, it should complete all elements and follow-up continuously.
The urban village health volunteers are still needed because they act
as the coordinators among health personnel and the community and speed
up implementation. There should be an increased number of village
health volunteers to cover the entire area. The training course should
be continuously offered emphasizing knowledge and ability and giving
the chance to learn and practice skills at health services centers to
develop potential and be more accepted by the community. The
characteristics of village health volunteers include good human
relations, willingness, good intention and community acceptance.
Important problems on social environment in urban
settings include pollution from garbage, waste water, air pollution and
traffic jam. Policy for environmental problems-solving need mutual
responsibility from all units to set up an educational system and
create awareness in adolescence for environmental conservation. Law has
to be seriously enforced.
At present, the quality of life of people in
urban settings is better than rural people due to the chance to receive
information and easy accessibility. The indicators to measure the
quality of life of people in urban settings are the happiness of the
individual, family and the community, good hygiene, education,
adequate, income, safety and sufficient properties, receiving social
services equally and being good citizens.
We have enjoyed the cooperative effort directed towards mutual benefit
between us and the Asian Urban Information Center of Kobe. It is our
hope that the finding and our interpretation will be not only of
academic interest but that it will also contribute practically towards
the uplifting of health of those people in the sectors of populations
suffering poverty and malnutrition. As mentioned earlier their
sickness, and the number of those who died under these conditions had
not been seen as part of the health problem. We hope this study can be
one suggestion to such indifferences or insufficient evaluations of the
past, and that it will provide a needed perspective for policy makers
and relevant leaders to take the kind of necessary initiatives to
promote the health of the needy sectors of our national population.
To Top
VI. References
ICPD. Programme of Action of the United Nations
International Conference
On Population and Development; 1994
Chanawongse, Krasae. Et al. Khon Kaen: Heart of the Northeast. In:Gayl
D. Ness and Michael M. Low, (eds.). Five Cities Modeling Asian Urban
Population- Environment Dynamics. Singopore: Oxford University Press;
2000
Sakondhavat, Chuanchom. Reasearch Study on Services and Development in
Reproductive Health and Primary Health Care. Khon Kaen: Faculty of
Medicine; 2001.
Chantawanich, Supang. Data Analysis on Qualitative Research. Text book
Project of Faculty of Political Science, Chulanlongkorn University;
1993.
Kaewhawongse, theeraphong. Model Development of Cooperation among Gos,
NGOs and people Organization to Implement Primary Health Care policy in
Khon Kaen Province: Klung-nana Wittaya Press; 1999 Supradit, Pornthip.
Et al. Current Situation Report and Trend of Primary Health Care in
Thailand. Bangkok: Express Transportation Organization of Thailand
Press; 2000.
Wirakul, Wanida, Muenkham, Kwanchai and Hassaroke, Jirawan. A Study
onSituation and Development Trends of Primary Health Care in
Northeastern, Khon Laen: Klung-nana Wittaya Press; 1998.
Wirakul, Wanida. A Study on Evolution, Success and Development Trends
Of Primary Health Care, Khon Kaen: Klung-nana Wittaya Press; 2002.
Wongkhomthong, Som-arch and Pramanpol, Somjai. Evolution of Primary
Health Care in Thailand. Bangkok: P.A. Living Co. Ltd; 1997.
VII. Appendex
Research Instruments
- survey form on health opinions of people in
urban settings (clients at the Municipality Health Services Center)
survey form on health opinions of people in urban
settings (clients at the Community Primary Health Care Center)
interview form to health providers on health
opinions of people in urban settings
interview form to administrators on health
opinions of people in urban settings
Survey Form
Health
opinions of people in urban settings
(Clients at the Municipality Health Care Services Center)
Date of interview…………………..month…………….year
Name of interviewer……………………………………………..
Name of field supervisor…………………………………….
Address…………………Sub district………………………….Muang District. Khon Kaen
Part 1 Demographic data
1. Gender
1. Male 2. Female
2. Age………….fully year.
3. Religion
1. Buddhism 2. Muslim
3. Christian 4. Others specify………………….
4. Educational level
1. No schooling
2. Primary school (Grade 4)
3. Primary school (Grade 7)
4. Junior secondary
5. High school
6. Junior college
7. Diploma
8. Bachelor Degree
9. Higher than Bachelor
10. Other, specify………………
5. Occupation
1. Government services
2. Agriculturist
3. Business/commerce
4. Housewife
5. Laborer
6. Student
7. Firm/Factory employee
8. Other, specify……………….
6. Marital status
1. Single
2. Married
3. Divorce/Separated
7. Family income per month…………………….bath
To Top
Part 2 Reproductive health behavior (delivery,
contraception, child rearing)
(Question 1-9 only married people aged between
15-49 years)
1. How old were you and your wife when first married?………………Years
2. How many times have you had an abortion……………….times
Male…………….. Female…………………
3. Do you practice contraceptive methods now?
Yes
During pregnant (skip to Q. 10)
No
4. What methods of contraception do you practice now (choose more than
one)
Sterilization
Oral pill
Injection
IUD
Condom
Norplant
Other, specify…………………..
5. Where is the place you get contraceptive service?
Government hospital
Municipality health Service Center
Private hospital
Private clinic
Drug store
Other, specify……………….
6. Are you satisfied with the service?
Yes
No, because…………….
Don’t know/never practiced contraceptive
7. During the past 3 years, have there been any pregnant woman in your
family?
Yes, …………….person
No (skip to Q. 13)
8. Did the pregnant woman go to visit ANC? (In case there are many
pregnant women, give the details of the latest pregnancy)
Yes, number of ANC visits……………….times
No
9. Where did you deliver?
Hospital
Municipality Health Service Center
Private Health Center
Other, specify…………………….
Weight of newborn baby………………….grams
10. Why did you go to that palace for delivery?
Convenience
Near house
Cheap/Free
Safety
Modern equipment
Other, specify…………………….
11. After delivery, did you ever receive post natal care (both mother
and child) or receive
a home visit by health personnel?
Yes,…………………..times
No
12. Did you give breast-feeding to your children after birth?
No
Yes
Breast feeding and formula powdered milk
13. Do you have children under 1 year in your family?
Yes, age………………month
No (skip to Q. 16)
14. Did your children get complete immunization as mentioned below?
14.1 Diptheria / Pertussis /Tetanus
1. Complete
2. Not completed, because……………..
14.2 BCG
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
14.3 Poliomyelitis 1. Complete
2. Not completed, because……………..
14.4 Hepatitis
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
14.5 Rubella
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
15. Do you have children 1-6 years?
Yes,……………….person
No (skip to Q. 19)
16. Did your children get complete immunization as mentioned below? (if
there are many children, report only the youngest one)
14.1 Diptheria / Pertussis /Tetanus
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
14.2 BCG
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
14.3 Poliomyelitis
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
14.4 Hepatitis
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
14.5 Rubella
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
14.6 Encephalitis
1. Complete 2. Not completed, because……………..
17. Where did you go to get immunization as mentioned above?
Hospital
Health Service Center
Private Health Services
Other, specify………………….
18. Why did you go that place? (choose more than one)
Convenience
2. Near house
Cheap/Free
Safety
Modern equipment 6. Other, specify
19. Do you have people whose age is over 35 years old?
Yes,………………person
No (skip to Q. 21)
20. Do the people mentioned-above go to check for cancer of the genital
system?
Yes
Some had checked
No
21. Have you family members contracted any sexually transmitted disease
(AIDS and Venereal Diseases)?
Yes, specify disease………………..
No
To
Top
Part 3 Opinions towards urban
health services provided
Do you have a Municipality Health
Care services Center?
No, because there is a hospital in the sub district
Yes, namely……………………………….located at……………………………….
| 1. |
Is it convenient to travel to receive
health services? |
1. Yes |
2. No because……… |
| |
Do you think service time suitable? |
1. Yes |
2. No it must be……………. |
| 3. |
Do you think there is adequate service at the MHSC? |
1. Yes |
2. NoIt should add……….. |
| 4. |
Do you think it is expensive for treatment? (not
included travel cost) |
1. Yes |
2. No
3. Don’t know/free |
| 5. |
Health personnel at the MHSC are able to provide the
following service? |
|
|
| |
- diagnosis/physical examination
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- laboratory test
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- treatment
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- referral system
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- counseling/health
education/information
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- disease control/prevention (i.e.
vaccination, abate sand distribution)
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- consumer protection(controlling store
to sell the consumer products with FDA guarantee)
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- AIDS control and prevention (condom
distribution, sex dissemination)
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- home visit
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- conducting community activity
(village development, fund management)
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- counseling
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| 6. |
Do you think that equipment/medical supplies at the
MHSC are adequate? |
|
|
| |
- adequate
|
1. Yes |
2. No
3. Don’t know |
| |
- good quality
|
1. Yes |
2. No
3. Don’t know |
| |
- modern
|
1. Yes |
2. No
3. Don’t know |
| 7. |
What do you think of the MHSC condition areas? |
|
|
| |
- inside MHSC
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- outside MHSC
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| 8. |
What do you think with the performance of health
personnel at the MHSC? |
|
|
| |
- enough staff
|
1. Enough |
2. Not enough
3. Don’t know |
| |
- good human relation
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
| |
- good general ability
|
1. Good |
2. Not good
3. Don’t know |
Part 4 Opinions towards health
system management and essential health service
4.1 What do you think of the
health system management and health services which also have a CPHCC,
MHSC and hospital in the same area:
| Issues |
Good |
Not good |
Don’t know |
a. have chance to get equal treatment
|
…………… |
…………… |
…………… |
| b. have completed types of services |
…………… |
…………… |
…………… |
| c. have service cover all population |
…………… |
…………… |
…………… |
| d. convenient to access the service |
…………… |
…………… |
…………… |
|